1 2

Table 9.1. Characteristics of Apple Rootstocks and Interstem Combinations
Preparedby Dr. Paul Domoto, Dept. of Horticulture, Iowa State University Extension(2/96)

RootstockSize
1FruitingHardinessCrown RotFireRemarks

AnchorageBlight

IMAGE Imgs/Printing01.gif

Seedling


Antonovka 313


M.4


MM.111


MM.106


B.490


Cornell-Geneva
210

M.7a,
EMLA 7


Geneva 30


M.26,
EMLA 26


Geneva 11

100%


100%


80-85%


80-85%


70-75%


70-75%


70-75%


60-65%


60-65%


55-60%


55-60%

Slow bearing, yield
variable

Slow bearing,
moderate
productivity

Moderately early
bearing, good
productivity

Moderately slow
bearing, medium
productivity.

Early bearing,
productive


Early bearing,
moderate
productivity

Early bearing,
productive

Early bearing,
moderate
productivity.

Earlier bearing &
more productive
than M.7a

Very early bearing,
productive


Very early bearing,
very productive

Well anchored


Well anchored


Well anchored


Well anchored
Avoid wet sites


Good on most soils
Avoid poorly
drained soils

Well anchored


Well anchored


Free-standing but
leans.
Avoid Clay soil.

Well anchored


May need support
in early years


Well anchored

Hardy


Considered hardy,
more testing
needed

Moderate


Moderate


Very susc. early,
hardy late winter


Considered hardy;
more testing
needed

Needs testing


Moderate; roots
tender,


Testing required


Hardiest M. or MM.
series;somewhat
slow to harden-off

Testing required

Variable


Resistant


Resistant


Tolerant on well
drained soils.


Very susceptible


Moderately
resistant


Resistant


Slightly susc. on
wet sites


Tolerant


Susceptible on
poorly drained
soils

Moderately
resistant

Tolerant


Moderately
susceptible


Tolerant


Tolerant


Moderately
susceptible


Tolerant


Resistant


Tolerant


Resistant


Very
susceptible


Moderately
resistant

65-85% size control with spur. Suckering may
be a problem; very few burrknots

Some suckering; few burrknots
2
susceptible to late winter freezes.


Most productive vigorous rootstock in regional
testing. Moderate to heavy suckering; few
burrknots
2.

Tree form is more up-right. Little suckering;
prone to burrknots
2. Moderately susceptible to
tomato ringspot virus
3.

Very little suckering; prone to burrknots
susceptible to tomato ringspot virus


May be a replacement for MM.106. May be
susceptible to late winter freezes. Almost no
suckering; few burrknots
2.

Suckering may be a problem. May be released
soon, available 1998?

Suckers, prone to burrknots
2. Most widely
adapted clonally propagated rootstock.


Promising Less prone to suckering than M.7a;
burrknots
2rare. Susceptible to latent viruses


Little suckering; very prone to burrknots
Susceptible to tomato ring-spot virus
variety compatibility problems

Promising new rootstock. Little suckering; very
few burrknots
2. Available 1999?

IMAGE Imgs/Printing02.gif

1998 New Jersey Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide